top of page
User Interface

[ AiStandard.io Alliance ]

The Alliance Charter

< Back

Article 10

Updation Date and Time

10 May 2025

Article 10 | Documentation Analysis and Preliminary Assessment

 

(1)   This Article governs the process of analysing and assessing committee documentation after sessions, ensuring that all documents meet the required standards and align with the strategic objectives of the AI Standardisation Alliance.

 

(2)   Initial Documentation Review: The Secretariat shall conduct an initial review of all submitted documents to ensure:

(a)   Compliance with Schedule 2 guidelines.

(b)   Proper classification under the AISTANDARDIO numbering system.

(c)   Completeness of the documentation, including all required sections (e.g., executive summaries, technical details, policy implications).

 

(3)   The Secretariat may request revisions or additional information from the committee chairpersons if any gaps or inconsistencies are identified during the initial review.

 

(4)   Technical and Policy Analysis:

(a)   Technical Analysis: For documents produced by the AI Development Committee, a thorough technical analysis may be considered to evaluate:

(i)    Feasibility of proposed AI solutions.

(ii)   Scalability and interoperability of technical frameworks.

(iii)  Alignment with existing AI standards and emerging technologies.

 

(b)   Policy Analysis: For documents produced by the Policy Innovation Committee and Strategic Affairs Committee, a policy analysis may be considered to evaluate:

(i)    Regulatory compliance and potential legal implications.

(ii)   Impact on current policy frameworks.

(iii)  Alignment with ethical standards, particularly those outlined in Schedule 1.

 

(5)   Risk Identification and Mitigation: During the analysis phase, any potential risks identified in the documentation should be documented, including:

(a)   Technical risks related to implementation or scalability.

(b)   Legal or regulatory risks.

(c)   Ethical risks concerning fairness, transparency, or data privacy.

 

(6)   Preliminary Recommendations: Based on the analysis, preliminary recommendations can be made regarding:

(a)   The readiness of the document for stakeholder review.

(b)   Any revisions required before proceeding to further phases.

(c)   Suggested areas for further research or consultation.

 

(7)   Once all revisions have been made and approved by the Secretariat, documents shall be prepared for stakeholder review as outlined in Article 12.

3.png

The Indian Society of Artificial Intelligence and Law (ISAIL.IN) is an artificial intelligence industry forum, founded by Abhivardhan in 2018. Our mission as an independent, not-for-profit industry forum for the analytics & AI industry in India is to promote responsible development of artificial intelligence and its standardisation in India.

Enforcing AI standards in the Indian and Indo-Pacific markets is hard. And yet, ISAIL.IN intends to document data and inputs associated with the market tendencies around three facets of artificial intelligence: its adoption, research around it, and its real-life policy implications across as many sectors as possible.


This is why, the AiStandard.io Alliance, administered by ISAIL.IN, intends to establish an allies of AI entities in India, Asia and the Global South, to develop market-friendly AI standards, with sector-specific, and sector-neutral contexts.

  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Youtube

Subscribe for Updates.

Thanks for submitting!

ISAIL is a registered charitable trust since 2019, under the Indian Trusts Act, 1882.

We are glad to notify that any membership fee or contributions submitted to the Indian Society of Artificial Intelligence and Law are subject to exemptions under the Sections 12A & 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

© Indian Society of Artificial Intelligence and Law.
bottom of page